Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elke The Stallion (2nd nomination)

=[[Elke The Stallion]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elke The Stallion}}

:{{la|Elke The Stallion}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Elke The Stallion}})

Non-notable person, the grandiose claims notwithstanding; see [http://www.google.com/search?q=Elke+The+Stallion&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#sclient=psy&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&tbs=nws:1%2Car%3A1&q=%22Elke+The+Stallion%22&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.&fp=a3cda108bfaa905c this]. Drmies (talk) 21:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Doesn't appear to meet notability criteria; no significant sources found. Shell babelfish 05:12, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete - Lacks coverage in reliable sources. There certainly is coverage in unreliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 14:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Then again, the videos (yes, I watched one of them, and learned something about the culture I live in) show that she significantly and reliably lacks coverage in certain areas. Of course that's personal observation. Drmies (talk) 15:48, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete could find no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources, or any indication of notability in the article. --BelovedFreak 14:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.