Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eminem's fifth studio album (2nd nomination)

{{ns:0|M}}

{{#ifeq:Eminem's fifth studio album (2nd nomination)|Eminem's fifth studio album (2nd nomination)||

:{{la|Eminem's fifth studio album}} – (View AfD)(View log)

This article was already deleted once, and rightfully so. It is completely speculative and is about an untitled future album which Eminem is rumored to be working on. There's no reason to have this yet--I'm sure Eminem will release a fifth album but it's complete conjecture at this point. Delete again. Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 08:00, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I think this page shoudn't be deleted. Both T.I. and 50 Cent have confirmed that Eminem is working on his new album and some tracks are ready. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.21.181.198 (talk • contribs)

:Hmm... it appears as though it alread has been deleted. Charlie 08:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

::Still there. Redlinks were the result of some problems with the (2nd nomination) linking, which I've repaired. Serpent's Choice 13:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per the reasons given in the original AfD discussion, which can be found here. Doesn't appear to be a straight re-creation of content, so apparently not speediable. Deor 18:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete- a quote that he may be doing a 5th album is not sufficient to create a meaningful article Thunderwing 21:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

It shouldn't get deleted because almost everyone that's in or knows about Eminem knows he's working on a new album and Kuniva from D12, 50 Cent, and T.I confirmed he's working on one. Plus if this get's deleted another person will create a fake album or another page like this. TahoeZ71 00:47, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete until something more than "Eminem is working on a new album" is made public. The album will become almost unavoidably notable on release - and maybe even earlier - but currently it's a nothing. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 05:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

redirect to Eminem, which will (hopefuly0 stop re-creation of a speculative article. Totnesmartin 09:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.