Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emirates Environmental Group (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Several improvents have been made on the article which makes it passes GNG (non-admin closure) Kichu🐘 Need any help? 09:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Emirates Environmental Group]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emirates Environmental Group}}

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Emirates Environmental Group}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Emirates Environmental Group}})

There is no RS coverage of this group. The page was the subject of a AfD in 2012 which resulted in a no-consensus. In the decade since then, no RS content has been added to the page. In short, the group does not meet notability requirements. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 15:08, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:28, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:28, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete: Listed sources insufficient, does not appear notable. Also completely unverifiable since the page lacks inline citations. Aasim (talk) 20:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep It IS a thing here in the Emirates, it's just got a hugely neglected page. It needs an editor who cares to do the work, is all. There aren't a lot of them around here though. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

:: I improved the article to at least 'keep' standard - it needs more work, for sure (from someone more engaged in this area than I), but it's the leading environmental organisation in the Emirates. Any attempt at a BEFORE would have established that. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep per improvements of Alexandermcnabb. Passes WP:GNG and WP:CORP multiple exclusive coverages from 2006 in national news. Chirota (talk) 15:23, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:00, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:53, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.