Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enosh Mwesigwa

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Even with relatively minimal participation, it's clear there is no evidence he meets any notability guideline at this time. DGG ( talk ) 01:56, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

=[[Enosh Mwesigwa]]=

:{{la|Enosh Mwesigwa}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Enosh_Mwesigwa Stats])

:({{Find sources|Enosh Mwesigwa}})

Non-notable pharmacologist. Citations only serve to show that he has written a couple of papers. Searches elsewhere do little more than to confirm that he is listed in the expected directory and social sites. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:49, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete. Insufficient cites on GS for WP:Prof. What else is there? Xxanthippe (talk) 22:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC).
  • Delete. The claims of being one of the first Ugandans to... and of being the CEO of... look more like something that would fit WP:GNG than WP:PROF, and in any case the lack of citations isn't the biggest issue — it's the lack of reliable sources that can be used to back up anything we can say about the subject. Highbeam and Google news turned up nothing. I did find enough professional business profile sites to convince me that the article is reasonably factual, but they don't count for notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:23, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.