Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrique Odría

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 06:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

=[[Enrique Odría]]=

:{{la|Enrique Odría}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Enrique_Odr%C3%ADa Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Enrique Odría}})

Appears to fail WP:BASIC. I was unable to locate any independent sources that discuss the subject in depth. Someone able to evaluate Spanish language sources might have more luck. VQuakr (talk) 07:11, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete no sources covering him, either in English and Spanish. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. No significant claim of notability other than being related to a former leader (WP:NOTINHERITED) and even there it isn't clear what the relationship is. Suitable redirect targets are lacking. It doesn't seem that he will be a presidential candidate himself and the article on his party doesn't exist. Valenciano (talk) 11:50, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable. Kierzek (talk) 17:57, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 08:08, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 08:08, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 08:09, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete. Being a candidate for an office that the subject hasn't won yet is not a claim of notability that passes WP:NPOL, no serious claim has been made here that he passes any other subject-specific inclusion rule either, the sourcing isn't good enough to vault him over WP:GNG, and notability is not inherited. Bearcat (talk) 20:22, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.