Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ensighten

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:37, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Ensighten]]=

:{{la|Ensighten}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ensighten Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Ensighten}})

Promotional. Too many primary sources. Article does not meet WP:N. Investedpersonas (talk) 14:25, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:39, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:39, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:39, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:39, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:39, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:SOAP and WP:NOPRIMARY. Syndicater (talk) 20:35, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Delete - Fails WP:GNG, WP:NOTPROMO References are about promotion (or are trivial mentions). Not so much on what the company has done that is significant. ogenstein (talk) 10:21, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.