Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environmentalist
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Environmentalism. (non-admin closure) — Benison (Beni · talk) 09:50, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
=[[:Environmentalist]]=
:{{la|1=Environmentalist}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Environmentalist}})
Redundant content fork of Environmentalism. The premise of the existence of this article is that a philosophy and people who subscribe to that philosophy are separate and meaningful topics, which I think most editors can agree is absurd. That said, a standalone list of notable environmentalists would be perfectly valid, and one could easily be created by splitting off the existing list within this article (presumably to List of environmentalists, which is currently a redirect). — Anonymous 00:50, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Environment. — Anonymous 00:50, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to environmentalism. Per nom, not seeing any reason this cannot be covered in that article. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:11, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect is reasonable and what we do most often in such cases. An argument could be made to keep, but it acts as a fork, which is not the best situation. Bearian (talk) 17:11, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.