Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epistematics

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Deductive reasoning. PhilKnight (talk) 18:09, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

=[[Epistematics]]=

:{{la|Epistematics}} ([{{fullurl:Epistematics|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epistematics}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Inscrutable stub that seems to be an essay/neologism/original research. The only reference is an equally impenetrable (to me, at least) paper by one Chiara Carlino, who I believe to be the article's creator: User:C Chiara. Others raised the same concerns about this article back in 2007. Reyk _YO! 07:20, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Redirect to deductive reasoning. As the opposite of inductive reasoning, it is definitionally identical to deductive reasoning and is therefore redundant. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 08:42, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Redirect as Falcon Kirtaran suggests. Having had a skim through the linked paper, I can't see what distinguishes epistematic reasoning from deductive reasoning, which given the article's creator suggests this article may just be an excuse to publicise his/her paper on the subject. Possibly the paper has some useful information in itself, I'm no expert on the topic - but certainly it seems this article is never going to be anything but a substantial duplication of deductive reasoning. ~ mazca ^{t | c} 17:39, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.