Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eprocks

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Eprocks]]=

:{{la|Eprocks}} ([{{fullurl:Eprocks|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eprocks}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

I haven't found any significant coverage of this institution in google news, books, or web search. I can't find any independant reliable sources even mentioning EPRocks in the passing. Thereby it fails notability guidelines. It will also have a hard time supplying verifiable encyclopedic content, failing WP:V Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:18, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

----

Re-listed because the {{tls|afd1}} notice was not applied until today. Uncle G (talk) 17:48, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete - I can find nothing about this nonprofit except for their website, and some directory entries. There has been zero coverage of their activity in reliable sources. I doubt there is actually much activity by this nonprofit as the website is a web forum that appears to rank marching bands. -- Whpq (talk) 19:59, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete: Doesn't show notability per WP:ORG. Schuym1 (talk) 21:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete per above. The Rolling Camel (talk) 00:23, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.