Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erika Cosby

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Enough consensus; the last vote was for deletion but it gave a reason to keep the article instead. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

=[[Erika Cosby]]=

:{{la|Erika Cosby}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Erika_Cosby Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Erika Cosby}})

No real notability on her own. Falls into category of WP:INHERITED. Fails WP:GNG. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 03:25, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep - Sufficient substantial sourcing to satisfy GNG. All "E. Cosby" articles are not the same. Carrite (talk) 02:00, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:06, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep - NOTINHERITED doesn't even apply .... there's enough sources and information to warrant an own article. Passes GNG. –Davey2010Talk 03:17, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Children of famous people can be notable in their own right. This is one example, and the coverage in reliable sources demonstrates it. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:35, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete despite of who her father is. She's the recipient of major art grants and has had solo exhibits in major art centers. Bearian (talk) 01:04, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
  • :Er, did something slip here User:Bearian? "She's the recipient of major art grants and has had solo exhibits in major art centers." did you intend to vote KEEP?E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.