Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest Ridding

=[[Ernest Ridding]]=

:{{la|Ernest Ridding}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest Ridding}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Ernest Ridding}})

Although he appears to be an interesting character, he does not meet the notability requirements of WP:BIO. Although he would meet the general criteria of being "...interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention...", I think he fails the more specific criteria, in that there is not significant published coverage of him - I don't think we can rely on just one news article or that he was included in a wider sociological exhibition. If there was an article of Sydney eccentrics or an article on the exhibition in which Ridding featured, I would propose a merge, but in the circumstances I propose that the article is deleted Wikipeterproject (talk) 16:37, 30 April 2010 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

  • Keep I count 3 reliable sources which discuss him, at least fairly in depth.Borock (talk) 02:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep See [http://acms.sl.nsw.gov.au/item/itemDetailPaged.aspx?itemID=404459 here], he ran as an Independent candidate in the 1988 NSW state election. Charity work & other biographical details are given by: State Library of New South Wales. Historical evidence also presented in photographs at same site [http://acms.sl.nsw.gov.au/item/itemDetailPaged.aspx?itemID=153461], [http://acms.sl.nsw.gov.au/item/itemDetailPaged.aspx?itemID=414287]. According to my reading of WP:ANYBIO #2 he's notable.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 06:29, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep. The strength of coverage seems to be just above the level required for WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Alzarian16 (talk) 11:59, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.