Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esico of Ballenstedt

:{{la|Esico of Ballenstedt}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Esico_of_Ballenstedt Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Esico of Ballenstedt}})

Content is not verifiable. Ref - WP:BURDEN
TopCipher 11:48, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:11, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:11, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:11, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

• Keep - Google books results suggests this is based on entries in Encyclopedia Brittanica and seems to give more results when spelled Esiko and when the German or French prepositions, von or de are used. Based on those results, I think the subject meets GNG. Smmurphy^(Talk) 14:25, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

::I've expanded this page substantially over tha past day or so, largely based on [https://books.google.com/books?id=FOIZo8wlSsoC Harz-Zeitschrift] (2012) a historical journal about the Harz region. Smmurphy^(Talk) 21:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

• Userfy I'm not sold that the subject is notable. I'd like the closing admin to put this on my userspace for further research and maybe rehab. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
• Keep. Smmurphy has done the work. Srnec (talk) 18:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
• Keep. Subject clearly notable historical figure. Agathoclea (talk) 09:47, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.