Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eskimo Buddhism

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I know that it has only been open for a day, and that the article's creator hasn't been able to respond yet, but the consensus on this is clear. I don't think it will go any other way. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 03:26, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

=[[Eskimo Buddhism]]=

{{ns:0|S}}

:{{la|Eskimo Buddhism}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Eskimo Buddhism}})

WP:Neologism; only sources are blogs; one academic source is completely unrelated; no significant hits from Google search. Author of article is currently blocked for one week, but I will invite him to comment on his talk page and transclude it here. Singularity42 (talk) 20:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

: Comment previously transcluded from User talk:Jemesouviens32. {{User talk:Jemesouviens32}}

: Now removed, as changed user talk page is breaking the archived version of the AfD. Please re-add the transclusion if you have enough wikifu to point it at the correct version. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:48, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete - no reasonable references other than blogs, as nom points out, and generally appears to have been made-up, with nobody covering it seriously. Fails notability. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:48, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - per above. No reliable sources - no article in Wikipedia. Broccoli (talk) 20:56, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment - in order to make sure this AfD is completely fair, the author has on numerous occasions pointed to [http://www.infolanka.com/org/srilanka/cult/25.htm this article] as a reliable source. I have rejected it due to it being completely irrelevant. It's on a completely different topic (i.e. the cultural and religious origin of Tamils), and only has one useful throwaway line: "If the Bodhisathva was born into a European culture nearly 2600 years ago he would not have attained Buddhahood. Can anyone imagine an "Eskimo" Buddha?" Therefore, I do not think it counts a reliable source for this article's subject. Singularity42 (talk) 21:04, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete - As per above. This is a hoax. Bluehotel (talk) 21:53, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. The cited sources do not meet Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines, and I was not able to find any reliable sources with my own search to confirm that this religion exists or is notable. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:56, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: Hoax. Joe Chill (talk) 22:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: Kudos to the author: Quite an effort...creating a blog, a twitter account and multiple WP entries...creative...I lol'd...yet: a hoax Andi 3ö (talk) 23:59, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete: I can imagine indigenous North American buddhists. I can't imagine a unique set of buddhist practices being as difficult to document as this. Not reliably documented, no evidence of notability. Fifelfoo (talk) 00:08, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete This just looks nn...Modernist (talk) 00:11, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.