Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eslut

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 03:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

=[[Eslut]]=

:{{la|Eslut}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Eslut}})

Non-notable neologism that was created by one person. See here. Ryan Vesey (talk) 17:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Delete - Unencyclopedic content - WP:DICTIONARY. Happy Editing! — {{User|72.75.57.223}} _{17:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)}
Delete checked references, do not mention this wordCurb Chain (talk) 17:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:NEO for now. Qrsdogg (talk) 17:50, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Delete - Per WP:NEO, as mentioned by people before. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Delete Wikipedia is not the place to promote a neologism. Cullen328 (talk) 18:15, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Delete by default since we can't merge this with E-Pussy. eSlut has roughly zero popularity on Urban Dictionary, so it's definitely a non-notable neologism. Agent Vodello^{OK, Let's Party, Darling!} 20:04, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.