Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Essex Arms

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) Let'srun (talk) 18:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Essex Arms]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Essex Arms}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Essex Arms}})

No refs on the page, I don't see enough independent RS to show notability. JMWt (talk) 18:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

  • Keep: Found reviews from [https://thequietus.com/articles/05240-darren-hayman-the-secondary-modern-essex-arms-review The Quietus], [https://diymag.com/review/album/darren-hayman-essex-arms DIY], and [https://www.allmusic.com/album/essex-arms-mw0002055700 AllMusic.] That's plenty enough already. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 20:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Keep per the reviews found by QuietHere and since added to the article. The article could use some expansion but there are enough pro reviews to support a typical stub album article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 01:45, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
  • Keep per the reviews that QuietHere found; sources found and used should be enough for at least a stub/start-class article. Darling ☔ (talk · contribs) 03:25, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.