Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estonia at the IAAF World Championships

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. After three relistings the consensus to delete is fairly clear. Anyone who wants to write an actual article on the topic would no doubt find this mostly empty "template" of little use, and it's certainly of little use to our readers. I'll userfy it for anyone who wants to work on it, though. Deor (talk) 11:16, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

=[[Estonia at the IAAF World Championships]]=

:{{la|Estonia at the IAAF World Championships}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Estonia_at_the_IAAF_World_Championships Stats])

:({{Find sources|Estonia at the IAAF World Championships}})

Someone started this article but didn't finish. Tagged as an orphan since 2009 - I don't see the point of having this article if there isn't anything in it Gbawden (talk) 12:07, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete - It barely makes it past A3 as it contains a little bit of unreferenced content. This is essentially the frame for an article with no useful content in the frame. -- Whpq (talk) 17:00, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 11 July 2014 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 11:03, 18 July 2014 (UTC)



:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010(talk) 09:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)


  • Delete - No useful content.--Rpclod (talk) 01:03, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep and improve. The subject is notable even if the article is incomplete. Tchaliburton (talk) 04:56, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment Normally not a bad idea but there is no context, so delete. Kante4 (talk) 19:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Relisting comment: Relisted as at the moment there's good arguments for keep and delete so still merits adiscussion.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010(talk) 19:49, 3 August 2014 (UTC)


:Delete. No refs, no content, pointless topic. Szzuk (talk) 21:05, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.