Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eubac
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Eubac}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eubac}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Eubac}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz Read! Talk! 22:29, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
=[[:Eubac]]=
:{{la|1=Eubac}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Eubac}})
Too complicated for PROD. First off, yes this is a copyvio but if I stub it back to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eubac&oldid=288065178 this version], then it's an A7. As I consiered doing that, I realized I am unable to identify any independent sourcing with which to write an article under EUBAC, or the fuller name, European Building Automation and Controls Association. It does not appear they meet N:ORG Star Mississippi 01:18, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, and Europe. Star Mississippi 01:18, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Searching for "Eu.bac" (with the period) or "European Building Automation Controls Association" (without the "and") yields a few more results, but I'm still not seeing enough for notability, particularly under the exacting WP:NORG standard: it's just passing mentions and the like. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:33, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.