Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eugen Calmic

=[[Eugen Calmic]]=

:{{la|Eugen Calmic}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Eugen_Calmic Stats])

:({{Find sources|Eugen Calmic}})

In this hideous text, I can't discern what might pass for "multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject", and searches have proven futile thus far. - Biruitorul Talk 18:24, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

  • Comment The claims to have works in the Tate and Saatchi galleries would go a long way towards notability. However a search on the Tate site on his name turns up nothing, nor is he in the A to Z of artists on the Saatchi Gallery site. He does have work in saatchionline.com which is a different thing: a open-access online shop. AllyD (talk) 06:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 04:52, 25 July 2013 (UTC)


  • Delete, no reliable sources to back up the articles claims appear to be forthcoming--Jac16888 Talk 16:02, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.