Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Popiel
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
=[[:Eva Popiel]]=
:{{la|Eva Popiel}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Eva Popiel}})
Not really an actor. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. She was the Japanese representative for L'oreal from September 2003 to August 2005. scope_creepTalk 11:59, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:27, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:27, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:27, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:27, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:27, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
:Comment: Have you tried looking for sources in Japanese and Korean? It looks like there would be more notable sources in those languages. lullabying (talk) 06:05, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
::{{ping|Lullabying}} If you can fire three sources up here that look decent, then we can discuss it. At the moment there is no coverage. scope_creepTalk 11:15, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete no significant coverage. As per rules delete. Trakinwiki (talk) 16:05, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Ko and ja wiki articles are even more bare bones, sadly I cannot search in those languages. Polish sources give nothing. Fails NBIO but feel free to ping me if someone can read Japanese and Korean and finds better sources. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - There are multiple sources in Korean, a simple Naver search [https://search.naver.com/search.naver?sm=tab_hty.top&where=news&query=%EC%97%90%EB%B0%94+%ED%8F%AC%ED%94%BC%EC%97%98&oquery=%EC%97%90%EB%B0%94+%ED%8F%AC%ED%94%BC%EC%97%98&tqi=hLbThdp0JXosssAKUsRssssst4s-010200&nso=so%3Add%2Cp%3Aall&mynews=0&office_section_code=0&office_type=0&pd=0&photo=0&sort=1 turns up tonnes of references starting from 2007]. It's definitely not possible to go through each and every source given how many of them exist, but here's a few: [https://entertain.naver.com/read?oid=145&aid=0000007062], [https://entertain.naver.com/read?oid=469&aid=0000443557], [http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/art/2007/08/201_9097.html], [https://entertain.naver.com/read?oid=144&aid=0000181066], [https://entertain.naver.com/read?oid=109&aid=0004125911], [http://sports.hankooki.com/lpage/entv/201912/sp20191201092009136660.htm], [https://entertain.naver.com/read?oid=047&aid=0002016978], [https://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=103&oid=143&aid=0000081630], [https://entertain.naver.com/read?oid=016&aid=0000235531], [https://www.christiantoday.co.kr/news/303362], [https://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=102&oid=003&aid=0003469549], [https://entertain.naver.com/read?oid=079&aid=0000184405], [https://entertain.naver.com/read?oid=108&aid=0000074375], [https://entertain.naver.com/read?oid=109&aid=0000082802], [https://entertain.naver.com/read?oid=108&aid=0000061071],[http://www.newsway.co.kr/news/view?tp=1&ud=2019122319075570616]. --Ashleyyoursmile! 08:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Ashleyyoursmile}} A lot of these Naver domain article look like straight up PR. I've not looked at the news papers yet, but it looks like typical PR generated to promote the band at the beginning of their career. The christiantoday article is pure pufff. That is PR. I check the rest when I get back. scope_creepTalk 18:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
:::* {{u|Scope creep}}, yes some of these look like press releases. I haven't been able to check many of them myself, I'll see if I can find anything. Ashleyyoursmile! 04:47, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Ashleyyoursmile}} Can you find three per PW:THREE scope_creepTalk 09:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 11:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment {{ping|Ashleyyoursmile}} I meant, can you find three per WP:THREE refs that are decent to prove the article is notable. scope_creepTalk 13:33, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hi {{u|Scope creep}}, let me know what you think of [http://lady.khan.co.kr/khlady.html?mode=view&code=5&artid=201007011632201&pt=nv], [https://www.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/201911262014773842], [http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/art/2007/08/201_9097.html], and [http://sports.khan.co.kr/entertainment/sk_index.html?cat=view&art_id=201207311759053&sec_id=540101&pt=nv]. Ashleyyoursmile! 05:47, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ref 17: In 2006, the British beauty Eva Popiel, who began to gain fame for her outstanding beauty, her fluent Korean and candid and plain speaking skills in her talk show about her life in Korea of global beauties. PR. The Korean Times describes her as a reality star who is trying to convert her brief flutter of fame into an acting career. The third one mentions her career to date, appearing on The One Show, but it is all indicative of a PR assitant becoming briefly a reality star and trying to become an actor. It is a well worn path and currently believe that she is notable. Possibly WP:TOOSOON. She is a minor D grade reality star at the moment who is non-notable. scope_creepTalk 09:17, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough. The subject currently fails WP:ENT and appears to be WP:TOOSOON. Ashleyyoursmile! 09:40, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.