Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Vucci

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 21:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

=[[Evan Vucci]]=

:{{la|Evan Vucci}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Evan_Vucci Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Evan Vucci}})

"Evan Vucci photographer" found links at Books, News, browser and Highbeam but I question whether this somewhat sourced and seemingly acceptable article is notable and there's also no move target to elsewhere. This also hasn't changed much since April 2005 and it simply seems he's best known for that one event. SwisterTwister talk 07:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Comment. The article tells us that Vucci "[breathes] new perspectives in individuals and organizations worldwide, igniting the human spirit to overcome rising challenges, maintain naiveté [sic] and celebrate life." I sense the maintenance of naïveté within this very article. -- Hoary (talk) 10:15, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:53, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:41, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Keep This seems like one of those articles about a notable subject that no one has sourced. It sounds like his body of work is probably seen all over the world. We delete for non-notability, and we tag and work on subjects that appear notable. I know no one has done so in several years, and that includes us. I don't think we should delete it unless we have done the work. Dcs002 (talk) 05:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.