Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evangelos Moustakas

:{{la|Evangelos Moustakas}} ([{{fullurl:Evangelos Moustakas|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evangelos Moustakas}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{find sources|Evangelos Moustakas}})

Notability is asserted because the article claims that Moustakas is a senior lecturer at a major university. However, I have not been able to verify the claims in the article with a Google News Archive search. A Google Scholar search also returned no substantial results. Cunard (talk) 17:17, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Cunard (talk) 17:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
• Delete, not even close to meeting WP:PROF, no evidence that his work is widely used/cited. Article started/written by subject. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:43, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
• Delete as not notable according to WP:BIO or WP:PROF. Being a senior lecturer is certainly not enough by itself to establish notability (and I'm not sure I'd call Middlesex University a "major university" myself, though it depends what you mean by "major"). The only other claim to (minor) notability is that he's "Chair of the Special Interest Group in e-marketing at the Academy of Marketing in the UK" but I can find no documentation of that on [http://www.academyofmarketing.info/sigemarket.cfm their website] or on [http://www.mdx.ac.uk/schools/bs/staff/academics/marketing/evangelosmoustakas.asp his university webpage]. Even if true, [https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=AM-E-MARKETING their email discussion list archive] shows only one message has been posted since 2006, which hardly seems indicative of a active major scholarly network. --Qwfp (talk) 18:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
• Delete in view of above. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC).
• Delete, obviously. The reasons for deletion are strong and plenty. The article deserves to be removed from Wikipedia. Invest in knowledge (talk) 09:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
• Delete, username of main contributor suggests that article is auto-biographical. Patchy1Talk To Me! 09:51, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
• Comment I'm not sure he's notable, butt he factual information in the article is verified by the official web p. at the university. In anycase, removing the speedy was right, for there is at least an indication of possible importance. DGG ( talk ) 18:33, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.