Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolutionary Psychology of Cognition

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:21, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

=[[Evolutionary Psychology of Cognition]]=

:{{la|Evolutionary Psychology of Cognition}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Evolutionary_Psychology_of_Cognition Stats])

:({{Find sources|Evolutionary Psychology of Cognition}})

This is an essay written for a course, a content fork of Evolutionary psychology and Cognition; it's been abandoned since the end of the course. WP:MOS is observed more in breach than observation. Lack of online sources limits the number of potential contributors to those with physical access the a research library. Conceivably an article could be written on this topic (and I have nothing against the topic per se), but it would be less work to start over. See also the recent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolutionary psychology of kin selection and family. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 04:03, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Delete per nom and precedent. Ansh666 02:47, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 04:13, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Delete without prejudice per WP:DYNAMITE. Andrew³²⁷ 12:42, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.