Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolver One

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. So Why 20:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Evolver One]]=

:{{la|Evolver One}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Evolver_One Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Evolver One}})

No evidence to support WP:BAND. Article seems to be created solely to create an argument for keep in another AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tulsa Pittaway Ajf773 (talk) 09:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 09:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Keep. Clear evidence to support WP:BAND. "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself" WP:BAND#1. Article has multiple sources that independent and reliable and provide coverage of Evolver One. "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart." WP:BAND#2. Article has a verified claim on national charting. Article was not created to CREATE an argument for keep, it was created when challenged for evidence of the bands notability. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Keep - notable South African band with a #1 on the charts Gbawden (talk) 12:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
I cannot find evidence that it had a #1 single on the national charts. Sources?? Ajf773 (talk) 03:46, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Keep - for reasons above. Ouseriv (talk) 03:22, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Comment - "Article has a verified claim on national charting" This has not been verified. National charts should follow WP:GOODCHARTS and not have some random website state 'the artist has a chart topping song'. - TheMagnificentist 15:09, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
South Africa has one chart according to WP:GOODCHARTS, and it's compiled by Entertainment Monitoring Africa. Their site is [http://sa-ema.com/airplay-chart/ undergoing maintenance], and [https://web.archive.org/web/20161219124826/http://sa-ema.com/airplay-chart/ Archive.org links] don't work either. If I were to close this AfD now, I would close it as 'keep until the chart is live again'.--Laun chba ller 23:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 04:34, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Contrary to TheMagnificentist's unsupported claim The Witness (South African newspaper) is not a random website. It is South Africa's longest continuously published newspaper currently published by a major media organisation Media24. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:00, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.