Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Executive physicals

=[[Executive physicals]]=

:{{la|Executive physicals}} ([{{fullurl:Executive physicals|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Executive physicals}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Delete not notable Hell in a Bucket (talk) 18:28, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Comment - The article, so far, provides no evidence that "Executive Physicals" are notable in some way, or even that there really is such a thing. A Google search, though, indicates many hits for the topic, and I think a small but legitimate article may be a possibility. Tim Ross (talk) 18:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
  • A merge could be appropriate, into the main page on Physicals if we have one. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 18:53, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Merge with Physical examination ttonyb1 (talk) 19:16, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 20:52, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Merge to Physical examination. It's just an expensive form of a regular physical, with a pre-set menu of tests. The "executive" notion appears because (1) it's inappropriately expensive, since most of the tests aren't medically necessary for any given individual, and (2) typically all scheduled efficiently on the same day (or multiple consecutive days, in some of the more extreme forms), so you're only out of the office once, instead of making multiple appointments. They are highly profitable operations, and most US hospitals and larger clinics offer this program. See {{PMID|18832242}} (or [http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/359/14/1424 here] for a peer-reviewed journal article on the subject. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.