Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Existential instantiation

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted --Steve _(Stephen)^talk 23:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

=[[Existential instantiation]]=

{{#ifeq:Existential instantiation|Existential instantiation||

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Existential instantiation}}

}}

:{{la|Existential instantiation}} – (View AfD)(View log)

This article contains two sentences; both are debateable. (I accept both, but I'm a Hilbertian, not an intuitionist.) If cleaned up, it would be a dictionary definition. No here here; delete Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Delete speedily as lacking context, actually - no idea what it's supposed to mean, but as it stands it means nothing to me. Guy (Help!) 20:13, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Speedy delete per Guy. semper fictilis 20:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Speedy delete as WP:CSD#A1, tagged as such. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 23:50, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.