Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploding chicken

:{{la|Exploding chicken}} ([{{fullurl:Exploding chicken|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploding chicken}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

The general phenomena itself, exploding chickens, has not been covered sufficiently by independent sources to pass WP:N. Collecting examples and synthesizing an article from them in order to advance the position that it is a notable phenomena is original research WP:SYN. Habanero-tan (talk) 11:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

• Comment Is there an article about the treatment of animals in film? I think a merge to the broader topic would be best. No need to lose the sourced bits about chickens related to this larger issue. ChildofMidnight (talk) 15:45, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:25, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 00:25, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

• Delete This is basically an "Exploding chickens in popular culture" article without the benefit of a primary article on a notable topic of "Exploding chicken". Utterly non-notable as a topic. Drawn Some (talk) 05:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

• Delete lack of notability Nja²⁴⁷ 08:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.