Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FAMULUS

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 03:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

=[[FAMULUS]]=

:{{la|FAMULUS}} – (View AfD)(View log)

Non notable robot. Prod removed by anon without comment. J Milburn (talk) 15:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Delete. I agree, not notable. Plus, this information is already available in KUKA. Tim Ross 18:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Delete. Non-notable, makes no mention of any secondary sources to verify it. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 16:57, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 17:09, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete - Assertion of notability unsupported by any third-party sources. Seems non-notable to me. -FrankTobia (talk) 18:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.