Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FPA Future of Planning Workgroup

:{{la|FPA_Future_of_Planning_Workgroup}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:FPA_Future_of_Planning_Workgroup}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|FPA_Future_of_Planning_Workgroup}})

Disputed PROD. Non-encyclopedic/non-notable. Appears to being using Wikipedia as a business tool Some jerk on the Internet (talk) 20:12, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
• Delete:
  
  The FPA Future of Planning Workgroup (FOPW) has as its purpose to facilitate the growth and evolution of the Body of Knowledge of the Financial Planning Profession. Body of Knowledge for these purposes is defined very, very broadly to encompass all areas of knowledge a financial planner needs to practice the art and science of financial planning, including, but not limited to, the CFP® Board Topics including their addendum Topics, and including business, practice management and career development topics.
  The FPA FOPW will gather Champions who will take on the role of Instigator. Persons with particular interest in one or more areas of knowledge relevant to the practice of financial planning are being invited to join our ranks as a Champion.
  
  Should have been speedily deleted as unambiguous advertising. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:28, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

• My intention is not to advertise anything, in fact, there is nothing to advertise as this is a non-profit workgroup. I am trying to invite others to participate in using Wikipedia to help define and evolve the Financial Planning Body of Knowledge. There are several other Wiki pages that are gathering and referencing resources w/r/t the Financial Planning profession. The purpose of this page is to lead people to those pages to participate in the gathering and referencing, and to begin to define a process for evolving the Body of Knowledge. User:ElissaBuie —Preceding undated comment added 20:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC).

:*The motive doesn't have to be profit for something to be advertising. Promotion of a concept, etc., also counts as spam. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:02, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete advertisement. OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 22:01, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
• Speedy delete: G11 as blatant spam, so tagged. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:01, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.