Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FTM cross-dressing

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There seems to be consensus not to delete, but no consensus as to whether this should be kept or merged. A merge discussion would be preferable over a second Afd. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:09, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

=[[FTM cross-dressing]]=

:{{la|FTM cross-dressing}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/FTM_cross-dressing Stats])

:({{Find sources|FTM cross-dressing}})

Unnecessary and unreferenced fork of cross-dressing and drag king. Essentially a dicdef. Pburka (talk) 03:17, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Merge No need to delete this. Insomesia (talk) 18:51, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Delete both articles There are only (unless I'm missing something) 2 types of cross-dressing. If we split it this way the only thing left in the main article would be cross-dressing in general. One article seems like the best way to go. Steve Dufour (talk) 22:23, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Keep or at the very least, Merge, agree with {{user|Insomesia}}, zero need to delete this page. — Cirt (talk) 00:55, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Keep However i would suggest that the linked articles be merged eg Breast binding etc be placed within the main article as having too few content in both to warrant individual pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.158.138.21 (talk) 11:14, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Keep In East Asia, there is a word refer FTM cross-dressing, (男裝,男装 :same word.) --Jeonggwa (talk) 23:48, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
That's an interesting point, but it doesn't explain why this needs to be a separate topic from cross-dressing. Pburka (talk) 00:28, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Merge to appropriate article. Morefoolhim 19:43, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Question why Drag king, Methods of passing as male, Transman remain separate article? --Jeonggwa (talk) 02:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
There are only (unless I'm missing something) 2 types of drag. but Drag queen and Drag king did not merged. --Jeonggwa (talk) 02:51, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.