Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FUPA

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[FUPA]]=

:{{la|FUPA}} ([{{fullurl:FUPA|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FUPA}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

The article defines a slang-term in a psuedo-medical way. More suitable for urban dictionary. Kick the cat (talk) 19:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Merge/redirect to Mons pubis, which is what this article defines. Cunard (talk) 20:22, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete – Not even a recognized slang term. ShoesssS ^Talk 20:46, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Strong delete the urban dictionary definition, as we are not Urban Dictionary. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete Do we need a new "Blatant UrbanDictionary Definition" CSD? It's not even correct, according to UD. ~ Amory (user • talk • contribs) 00:16, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Perhaps we do. I'll see into bringing this up at WP:CSD. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:38, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
...and I stopped before I brought it up. WP:NEO and all. Reviewing WP:CSD, it notes that pretty much any neologism is not something that can be CSD'd. But, we're not here to talk policy. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:48, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete No harm with innocent fun like this on your own web site, I suppose, but alleged topic is not encyclopedic, and definitely fails WP:N. Johnuniq (talk) 10:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.