Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F violin

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[F violin]]=

:{{la|F violin}} ([{{fullurl:F violin|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F violin}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

No sources cited, and does not appear to be notable —Snigbrook 12:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete. Unsourced. Amounts to a description of a non-standard tuning of an existing instrument, the violin, and thus not notable. tomasz. 12:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete - seems to be someone making a point about a teacher's methods? Search of the "reference" website in the article gives one hit for "violin", and nothing specific about "f violin". --DaveG12345 (talk) 12:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete: Fails WP:N. Schuym1 (talk) 16:58, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.