Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabio Barzagli

=[[Fabio Barzagli]]=

:{{la|Fabio Barzagli}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Fabio Barzagli}})

Article lacks reliable sources that independently establish the subject's notability. A [http://www.google.com/search?q=Fabio+Barzagli&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#q=%22Fabio+Barzagli%22&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=Lj0&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbs=nws:1,ar:1&source=lnt&sa=X&ei=8og4TYPNF5D3gAfshKTyCA&ved=0CA8QpwUoBQ&fp=14f3c407689a056a Google News search] delivers only 9 hits, and a search for [http://www.google.com/search?q=Fabio+Barzagli&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#sclient=psy&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=ql0&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&q=fby+barzagli&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&fp=87581eb4c8da6568 fby and barzagli] produces nothing that might be useful to the article. Drmies (talk) 19:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete. As per Drmies. I did independent searching and found nothing; however, I think there's a chance that other sources MIGHT turn up, such as local Italian papers (in English; or translated using iGoogle possibly) or possibly computer-music related publications. My advice to the article creators is to cut the article to bare bones, have ONLY acceptable references (ie not YouTube, not stores) and find a few good references along the lines of WP:RS. So I'm saying I may change my vote depending on what happens, but at present, it's delete.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 19:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.