Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FabricLive.30

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The available argument for keep is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which doesn't address the concerns laid out in the nomination. Kurykh (talk) 21:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

=[[:FabricLive.30]]=

:{{la|FabricLive.30}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/FabricLive.30 Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|FabricLive.30}})

Fails WP:NALBUM Domdeparis (talk) 10:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

  • Delete. It is a simple case of notability failure, as the nominator explained. —Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 11:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep. I believe this article is not eligible for deletion, because it adds to a series of albums. This particular instance has even more sources and references than most other articles within this category. If you deleted this article, you might as well delete all the other ones. Robcuiper (talk) 11:14, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

:*Comment I totally agree with you the other albums are no more notable than this one. I shall add them to the deletion request. --Domdeparis (talk) 13:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.