Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabrica Records

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 17:39, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

=[[Fabrica Records]]=

:{{la|Fabrica Records}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fabrica_Records Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Fabrica Records}})

Non notable record label. Sources only amount to passing mentions, and an interview on a free Wordpress blog. Plus, the creator is the owner of the company. Diego Grez (talk) 17:56, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 17:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC)



:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 12:21, 15 October 2014 (UTC)


:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.