Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FactoryMaster

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:12, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

=[[FactoryMaster]]=

:{{la|FactoryMaster}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|FactoryMaster}})

Non-notable per WP:COMPANY, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Proposed deletion removed by creator without explanation. Invitrovanitas (talk) 15:59, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Invitrovanitas (talk) 16:00, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —Invitrovanitas (talk) 16:00, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This is a software company that provides Material Requirement Planning (MRP) software solution for SMEs worldwide. An article about such a business is not allowed unless they use the yellow covers on their TPS reports, and we are unfortunately out of yellow covers. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Delete. There is a defence of the article on the talk page, but it doesn't get round the fact that the coverage in third-party reliable sources is trivial. Come back when you've got a bit more attention. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 18:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
I dont believe this should be removed as FactoryMaster Ltd is a World Wide Known Software house! Such as Sage, Magic, Microsoft and so on. All FactoryMaster wants to do is have a similar Wikipedia page as other software houses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.123.152.253 (talk) 10:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC) — 213.123.152.253 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
You can get a page like other software houses when you can show you've got coverage in third-party sources (and no, unilaterally claiming you're world wide known doesn't count) like all other pages are meant to have. See WP:OTHERSTUFF. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 18:15, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.