Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith Christian School (Williams Bay, Wisconsin)

=[[Faith Christian School (Williams Bay, Wisconsin)]]=

:{{la|Faith Christian School (Williams Bay, Wisconsin)}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Faith_Christian_School_(Williams_Bay,_Wisconsin) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Faith Christian School (Williams Bay, Wisconsin)}})

No independent sources to prove notability Night of the Big Wind talk 13:56, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

  • Keep. I know the nominator disagrees with the rationale, as I've had this discussion with him before, but clear consensus is that all verified secondary schools are notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:21, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
  • When properly sourced, yes. But as you can see in the history it is in fact selfpromo and advertising. That is why I want independent and reliable sourced to prove that this school is notable. The RFC some time ago was clear enough that proving that a school exists was not enough. Night of the Big Wind talk 17:28, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep per standard practice for high schools of confirmed existence. Consider this an early stub, tag for more sources, move along. Carrite (talk) 02:19, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep - per the above. See also Wikipedia:Notability (high schools). Northamerica1000(talk) 10:03, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • That is an essay, not a policy. Night of the Big Wind talk 21:19, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep – sufficient sources are available to meet WP:GNG. We delete when sources are not available not because they have not been added to the page. TerriersFan (talk) 21:07, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Then be bold and add the sources. Night of the Big Wind talk 21:19, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.