Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fall from Heaven

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:09, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[Fall from Heaven]]=

:{{la|Fall from Heaven}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fall from Heaven}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Fall from Heaven}})

Non-notable demo that has not been mentioned in reliable sources. Article has been tagged for more references since its creation two years ago. Demo is already discussed in history section at Sonic Syndicate. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 01:24, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 01:26, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete. Was previously AfD'd and recreated as a redirected last year under a slightly different name (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fall From Heaven), so may quality for speedy. I'd suggest Black Lotus (Fallen Angels demo) also be added to this nomination. These demos have been deleted/redirected more times than I can count. The User:Simonpettersen was the user that seemed to be in the habit of continuously re-creating these articles now seems to be back as User:Siimon204 repeating the whole cycle again. As such, salt may be in order here. Rehevkor ✉ 02:36, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Merge - to Sonic Syndicate. -RobertMel (talk) 03:42, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

:Question - evidence is mounting that articles for the band's three early demo albums have been repeatedly deleted and re-created under slightly different names. Would WP:SALT be an effective remedy? DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:32, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.