Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatal Redemption

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:34, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

=[[Fatal Redemption]]=

:{{la|Fatal Redemption}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fatal_Redemption Stats])

:({{Find sources|Fatal Redemption}})

Purely promotional.

Self published book..see http://enigmaspublishing.com/meet-the-team/

Only 'supposedly' reliable independent source is "Blackmore Vale Magazine", which is not a magazine, and publishes user-generated content... see http://www.blackmorevale.co.uk/houserules.html

Unable to find any other independent coverage in reliable sources. Reventtalk 10:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete. I can't find anything to show that this book ultimately passes notability guidelines. If there was an article for Kilzer I'd suggest redirecting there, but he doesn't seem to have one. He has won a [http://www.nytimes.com/1990/04/13/nyregion/winners-of-the-1990-pulitzer-prizes-in-journalism-and-the-arts.html Pulitzer (along with Chris Ison for investigative reporting)], but that notability does not transfer to everything he writes. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:29, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete I'm not seeing any reliable sources that review, summarize or pertain to this book. It is therefore not notable according to Wikipedia standards. (WP:NBOOKS). Self promotion is not acceptable on Wikipedia either (WP:PLUG).--- Steve Quinn (talk) 00:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.