Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatjona R. Lubonja

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:27, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

=[[Fatjona R. Lubonja]]=

:{{la|Fatjona R. Lubonja}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fatjona_R._Lubonja Stats])

:({{Find sources|Fatjona R. Lubonja}})

No indication of notability per WP:SCHOLAR. Appears to be an autobiography. Kinu t/c 07:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete: The article does not clarify why the subject is relevant and does not give any neutral secundary sources. Subject won school awards in college, is a PhD with publications and wrote several books. None of this is a reason for being relevant on their own without secundary reliable sources indicating the relevance of this work and media or other forms of attention for them. -- Taketa (talk) 08:16, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

This article is more about giving to the community. Isn't that part of Academia? Voices like this are vital to the community they live. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.0.131.68 (talk) 16:56, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

:This does not explain how this article meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikipedia's purpose is not to "give a voice" to anyone. --Kinu t/c 04:20, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete. No credible assertion of notability. Agricola44 (talk) 15:00, 22 August 2014 (UTC).
  • Delete—Might eventually be notable as a public lecturer if the coverage continues to accrue, but that's a ways off yet. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 13:31, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.