Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faux passeports

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Joe (talk) 14:50, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Faux passeports]]=

:{{la|Faux passeports}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Faux_passeports Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Faux passeports}})

Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NBOOK nor GNG. » Shadowowl | talk 12:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Keep. The article clearly states this novel won the Prix Goncourt, a major literary award, which is WP:NBOOK criterion 2. --RL0919 (talk) 05:13, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:32, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:32, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Keep, crappy afd of an article that meets WP:NBOOK having won a major award, nominator has obviously not bothered any WP:BEFORE to check notability of subject. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:52, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.