Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fawaz Akhras

:{{la|Fawaz Akhras}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fawaz_Akhras Stats])

:({{Find sources|Fawaz Akhras}})

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:30, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Not notable. FunkMonk (talk) 22:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

• Keep: He satisfies notability guidelines including WP:BASIC criteria (substantial coverage by multiple, independent, third-party reliable sources). His name brings up 87 articles in google news with a very large number of national level newspapers. His name also brings up 15,400 total google hits. This shows the wide interest in this person. And he appears to be part of the Syrian president Bashar al-Assad ruling circle based on the leaked emails and embassy cables (US government suspects Akhras to be a key figure used by Assad to hide funds abroad; also he was advising the Syrian President during the crackdown of anti-regime protestors). He is a founding Director of the British Syrian Society and is involved with a number of Syrian causes. So being the father of the wife of Assad is only part of his notability. Tradedia (talk) 18:07, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
• Delete — No WP:INHERITED notability in this case. The first lady, yes. In-laws no. There's actually very little to nothing in any reliable source as to basic biographical contents. His resume, a story in the Guardian, and mentions on Wikileaks don't satisfy WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO to support a stand-alone encyclopedic biography. Certainly, these sources might support content at his daughter or son-in-law's articles. JFHJr (㊟) 08:20, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
• Keep: Fawaz Akhraz is a person of influence in the Assad's inner circle as is noted in the [http://www.herzliyaconference.org/_Uploads/2590Bashars.pdf pivotal study on the Assad government from 2006 (see page 381)]. The Wikileaks cables and the leaked emails further back up the claim of his influence in Assad's inner circle. It should be noted that the Syrian government is very much a family affair which is made clear in Shmuel Bar's 2006 report. I have added some more reliable sources to address the above posters concern about a lack of reliable sources for the individual's biographical background. It should also be noted that a google search of "Fawaz Akharas" shows prominently [http://www.google.com/search?q=fawaz+akhras&hl=en&safe=off&biw=1280&bih=705&cad=h] in the sidebar the Wikipedia introduction, his biographical picture, and individual connections. It would be strange to delete this information from google's sidebar information. Guest2625 (talk) 23:18, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable for more than just being a relative, notable for more than just one event, already a public figure by virtue of the British Syrian Society (the Guardian describes him as "a political gatekeeper for Damascus in London" [http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/mar/15/assad-father-in-law-uk-syria] -- Publico.es concurs: [http://www.publico.es/internacional/439522/fawaz-akhras-un-suegro-que-es-la-extension-del-regimen-en-londres]), passes the letter of the notability guidelines by being the subject of coverage in multiple independent reliable third-party sources. -- The Anome (talk) 11:58, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

• Keep. Inner-circle members of the Assad regime are not going to have a huge amount of media coverage, but I think it's been demonstrated that this individual is an important player. aliceinlampyland (talk) 15:51, 14 July 2012 (UTC).

• Keep. Aside from his aforementioned notability in his own right, his relationship to his daughter and her position within the Syrian establishment as the wife of the president, the Syrian crisis is also notable because of all the press coverage it has received as a current event. He is hardly a temporal figure, and even if he were only notable in his relation to his daughter and her high profile in the affairs of that country and its history, his former access along with its recent press coverage should remove any doubts. Wikipedia has articles on relatives of reasonably obscure thinkers from 2000 years ago, and this is someone who has been in the forefront of a controversial current affair. By keeping this article, it provides background that is seemingly necessary to understand the Syrian Conflict and its ensuing supporting granular details in a much fuller context and extent... If anything it should be augmented, not deleted...Stevenmitchell (talk) 13:44, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. The Anome (talk) 13:18, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.