Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fedir Vovk
=[[Fedir Vovk]]=
:{{la|Fedir Vovk}} –
:({{findsources|Fedir Vovk}})
no assertion of notability, and no sourced notability. UltraMagnusspeak 12:17, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- Expand and keep. Third party sources indicate notability: [http://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/pages/V/O/VovkFedir.htm] [http://www.loc.gov/rr/european/coll/ukra.html] and even [http://books.google.com/books?id=YXD7dyRUkKkC&pg=PA116&lpg=PA116ots=nGXIg5cYUY&sig=L3bOBL18RPLsgKNNelAoQk6N_Gc&hl=en&ei=s1_aSoj6FsiU8Aaf6fi2BQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CCMQ6AEwCA#v=onepage&f=false]. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:25, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. I added interwikis to more extensive articles on him in the Ukrainian and Russian Wikipedias. Comments from someone who reads one of those languages would be helpful. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:08, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:51, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Magog has demonstrated notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:49, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. I think the Encyclopedia of Ukraine article listed by Magog, and the Antonovych book now listed in the article, are enough for WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.