Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felicity Andersen

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:53, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Felicity Andersen]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Felicity Andersen}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Felicity_Andersen Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Felicity Andersen}})

Article that has been around for a long time (since 2004!) for a actress which sounds more notable on it's one line then she really is, out of her roles, most of them are uncredited (her most known film is a uncredited role which is mentioned in it's one line summary), none of her credited roles stand out either. Wgolf (talk) 01:53, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 05:02, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 05:02, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete. Her credits are pretty paltry, far, far short of satisfying WP:NACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:32, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete Not sure if I looked at the same things as NOM, but subject gets top billing for Trail of Passion (2003)? Subject's other two roles are credited but unnamed characters. Trail of Passion does get a simple wikimention here and here. Not enough for notability. Aoziwe (talk) 10:49, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

:*Trail of Passion is, if I read IMDb aright, a straight-to-video production that won Best Gratuitous Use of Sex at the Melbourne Underground Film Festival, according to IMDb, so not exactly a strong endorsement. Clarityfiend (talk) 18:52, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:38, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.