Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Female copulatory vocalizations

:{{la|Female copulatory vocalizations}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Female_copulatory_vocalizations Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Female copulatory vocalizations}})

:({{Find sources AFD|copulatory vocalization}})

:({{Find sources AFD|copulatory vocalizations}})

:({{Find sources AFD|copulation call}})

:({{Find sources AFD|copulation calls}})

• Delete. The article seems to violate WP:NEO and WP:NOTEVERYTHING Ormr2014 (talk) 02:37, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
• Keep. A topic that has received legitimate scientific inquiry: the article already includes multiple scholarly citations, and there are other sources on the topic (see [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22copulatory+vocalizations%22]), as well as news reports about the topic such as [http://www.salon.com/2012/02/23/a_nation_of_moaners/][http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/08/why-women-moan-during-sex/][http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/mairi-macleod/female-orgasm-mystery_b_5691820.html]. We may want to consider retitling to copulatory vocalization to leave room for content about males, as well as content about non-primates such as [https://books.google.com/books?id=pL2vyHjC4akC&lpg=PA27&ots=wiGd2xTi1N&dq=male%20tortoise%20copulation%20sound&pg=PA27#v=onepage&q=male%20tortoise%20copulation%20sound&f=false]. --Arxiloxos (talk) 03:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
• Keep. Our articles on sex-related topics are really lacking. If anything we need more articles, not deletions. If you compare for instance the comprehensive nature of articles related to sports, species, metropolitan areas, sexual topics come nowhere near the coverage. This is probably the only longstanding page on sounds in sex. We would be stupid; in fact retarded to delete it. As far as i know, the nominator has suggested that he is a prude and deletionist elsewhere. If that is the case, it would be preferable that he devotes his time elsewhere where his/here possible bias would not come into play. Freidnless lnoner (talk) 03:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

• Keep – Passes WP:N. The topic has received significant coverage in scholarly research sources. Sources include, but are not limited to: {{cite web|url=http://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/156843|title=Function of Copulatory Vocalizations in Mate Choice by Females of Japanese Macaques (Macaca fuscata) - Abstract - Folia Primatologica 1995, Vol. 64, No. 3 - Karger Publishers|work=karger.com}}, {{cite web|url=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02383826#page-1|title=Copulatory vocalizations of female macaques (Macaca fascicularis): Variability factors analysis|work=springer.com}}, {{cite web|url=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-010-9632-1#page-1|title=Evidence to Suggest that Copulatory Vocalizations in Women Are Not a Reflexive Consequence of Orgasm|work=springer.com}}, {{cite web|url=http://www.sciencemag.org/content/200/4348/1405.short|title=Copulatory vocalizations of chacma baboons (Papio ursinus), gibbons (Hylobates hoolock), and humans|author=WJ Hamilton 3rd|work=sciencemag.org}}. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

{{reflist|close=1}}

Strong keep A valid article about a notable subject. There is plenty of reliable research available on this subject and it has recieved coverage in reliable sources. Thank you Trout 71 16:51, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

::::Nomination Withdrawn. The general consensus is to keep the article so I'm withdrawing my nomination. Ormr2014 (talk) 17:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.