Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feminist historians (United Kingdom)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy close Closure made by nominator, who forgot to place closure rationale at the top so I'm doing it for them. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:46, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

=[[Feminist historians (United Kingdom)]]=

:{{la|Feminist historians (United Kingdom)}} ([{{fullurl:Feminist historians (United Kingdom)|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feminist historians (United Kingdom)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Virtually no content, no sources, and only assertion of notability is the claim that it is important. Very few edits in three years. Redirect to feminist history. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:36, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy close If you wanted this to be redirected, AfD is not the place to go. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Agreed. Afd isn't for redirecting articles. You can do that yourself. Withdraw and redirect it yourself. Remember to always be bold. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 02:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Obviously You are, of course, right. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:36, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.