Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fergus (band)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Insufficient coverage could be found to back up the claims made in the article and comply with WP:N. ~ mazca ^t/c 17:49, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Fergus (band)]]=

:{{la|Fergus (band)}} ([{{fullurl:Fergus (band)|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fergus (band)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Declined speedy (A7). The performance credits move this out of the speedy deletion zone, but the broad search term makes this less easy to prove notability or lack thereof. No opinion, just bringing the article here for discussion. Jamie^☆S93 20:47, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete. No idea why speedy was declined. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete they appear to be notable in Worcester, Massachusetts but not anywhere wider than that. I agree with JamieS93 that this is not a speedy deletion candidate as there are several claims to notability in the article, although none that are actually relevant. Thryduulf (talk) 11:07, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete fails WP:N. Highest Heights (talk) 13:41, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.