Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/File sequence

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:File sequence}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/File sequence}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:File sequence}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 23:33, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

=[[:File sequence]]=

:{{la|1=File sequence}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=File sequence}})

unsourced for over a decade and not sure this is notable Chidgk1 (talk) 16:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Delete an unsourced essay; the good parts are already at File system. I don't see use of this term on Google Scholar and cannot endorse any redirect. Walt Yoder (talk) 14:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.