Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filippo Fiumanò

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn Liz Read! Talk! 02:20, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Filippo Fiumanò]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Filippo Fiumanò}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Filippo Fiumanò}})

RIP WP:NFOOTY. This article is no longer notable as he fails WP:GNG Dr Salvus 17:11, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Dr Salvus 17:11, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Italy. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:13, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:24, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. I searched for sources, including in the Italian media, but didn't have any luck finding any significant ones. Probably a case of WP:TOOSOON. Alvaldi (talk) 18:33, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep - meets NFOOTBALL with ongoing career. Needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 12:26, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep, ongoing professional career. Also, see [https://www.lacasadic.com/news-serie-c/fiumano-juventus-esordio-focus-2-dicembre-2021/]. Nehme1499 15:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep, withdrawing request. I'd seen some AFDed articles about not very notable footballers after WP:NFOOTY being at that moment removed Dr Salvus 15:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep clearly passes GNG and NFOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:52, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Evidence of some coverage, so no harm extending to allow a more thorough search, but insufficient at this stage to satisfy GNG.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 00:07, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.