Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filmfront

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Filmfront]]=

:{{la|Filmfront}} ([{{fullurl:Filmfront|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filmfront}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This article do not appear to adhere to neither Wikipedia:Verifiability nor WP:WEB Nsaa (talk) 16:01, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 17:34, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Don't delete for now. I'm coming to the rescue. :D American Eagle (talk) 02:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

:*Strong Keep – Completely written with two major sources (many more are available, but this is enough for notability). American Eagle (talk) 03:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Strong delete No significant improvements. Majority of inbound links are from the site itself, or appear to be listed by persons closely associated with the site, and even then number only around 106. Little traffic. Notability fails Rotovia (talk) 00:52, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

:I dissent. There is somehow around [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Filmfront+-utah&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&sa=N&start=0 100 news sources] available for the website (add quotes, many of them appear to be unrelated, most in Norwegian), such as [http://www.teknofil.no/wip4/nettsamfunn-filmfantaster/d.epl?id=17647 this article] ([http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=hp&hl=en&js=n&u=http://www.teknofil.no/wip4/nettsamfunn-filmfantaster/d.epl?id=17647&sl=auto&tl=en&history_state0= English version], now added). Notability is not established by incoming links or the top 100 on Alexa, it is done through published, reliable sources. American Eagle (talk) 01:57, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Keep per American Eagle. Here's a more accurate [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Filmfront%22+-%22Film+front%22 link to Google News] and another Google-translated [http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=no&u=http://www.kampanje.com/medier/article163627.ece&ei=SyQkSv2LPJmmNd-dnaUJ&sa=X&oi=translate site review]. — Rankiri (talk) 19:02, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

:Question: How did you get " quotes " to format in the URL link? I have never been able to get my links to work if they have quotes in it at all, but your's did... American Eagle (talk) 20:59, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.