Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fin (disbanded)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:45, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

=[[Fin (disbanded)]]=

:{{la|Fin (disbanded)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fin_(disbanded) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Fin (disbanded)}})

Not sure this band meets WP:NMUSIC. Even the article appears to be candid about their notability: "Achieved mild success on the independent circuit in the UK" and "Their debut album sold poorly". As they were around in the early 1990s, it's very tough sometimes, because they could have had wide coverage in the music magazines of the time, meaning an equivalent band in 2016 would easily qualify for inclusion. However, without this sort of evidence, it's unclear whether they justify an article. It may require research and input would be welcome. KaisaL (talk) 14:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 14:41, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 14:44, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Comment: really going to struggle to find sources to keep this, I think. They certainly never had any chart success, and never made much impact even within the British indie scene: I don't recall their songs ever being played on BBC Radio 1's The Evening Session (the most likely radio outlet for their music in the early '90s), and if there is any mention of them in NME or Melody Maker I think it will likely be as passing mentions in the "introducing new bands" section of the magazines (I think in NME this was called On at the time), or as the support band in a gig review. Richard3120 (talk) 14:35, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

::This is a really informative contribution, thanks. It reaffirms my thoughts that they don't really justify an article as a minor band that never achieved success in their time. KaisaL (talk) 15:52, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:06, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 01:32, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 ^talk 15:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 15:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.